Where forest & forestry resources come together for all users!

Sponsored by the Michigan Forest Association and Michigan State University Extension

Forest Growth & Harvest
Article #181, February 2012
By Bill Cook

     Michigan harvests a lot of wood.  We see the trucks moving every day.  But, Michigan also grows a lot of wood. 

     What is the balance?

     On statewide basis, Michigan grows a bit more than twice the volume that we harvest, a ratio of about 2.1.  Michigan’s growth-to-harvest figure is higher than that of either Wisconsin or Minnesota.  Across the nation, it ranks in the middle of the pack. 

     A number greater than “1.0” means more wood grows than is harvested.  The higher the number, the larger the proportion of growth there is.  That could mean either growth is aggressive or harvest levels are low.  A number below “1.0” could mean either natural mortality is high or harvest levels are high. 

     Each year, more and more wood accumulates in Michigan forests.   Some would say this is a good thing.  Others see a portion of the growth as a sustainable way to bolster a part of Michigan’s economy, especially in rural areas. 

     Keep in mind that forest statistics are moving targets; changing somewhat every year.  More importantly, they vary across different regions within Michigan.  The “2.1 ratio” is not uniform across the state.  The ratio also varies among tree species. 

     It’s also important to understand that wood that accumulates in the inventory does not mean it is available for harvesting.  Inventory and availability are two very different things.  An owner won’t necessarily sell timber just because it’s there.  And, nearly half of Michigan’s forest is owned by families and individuals. 

     By looking closer at the inventory data, meaningful highlights can be “unpacked”.  This is especially important information for investors and planners looking at establishing a new forest products company or biomass energy facility. 

     For instance, the growth-to-harvest ratio increases from 1.3 in the Upper Peninsula, to nearly 4.0 in the Southern Lower Peninsula.  In the Northern Lower Peninsula, there is more growth accumulation on the east side than on the west side. 

     By tree species, the ratio varies even more widely. 

     All of our common tree species are growing at rates higher than harvest.  White pine grows nearly nine times the volume of its annual harvest.  The five most common species in Michigan - sugar maple, red maple, cedar, red pine, and quaking aspen - are growing at rates of 1.9, 2.5, 4.6, 2.6, and 1.4, respectively. 

     Other tree species are not doing as well, mostly due to impacts by exotic pests or natural cycles leading to maturity.  Where possible, harvest levels increase for these species, while the still wood remains sound.  Some of the declining species include the elms, paper birch, jack pine, beech, and white ash. 

     How do forest scientists know these sorts of things? 

          The U.S. Congress has charged, and funded, the U.S. Forest Service to collect forest inventory across the United States, on all ownerships.  This has been ongoing since the 1930s.  These inventories are done through a special unit called the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Unit.  This unit is often cited as the source for all sorts of descriptive data for forests.  The data are often called “FIA data”. 

     The FIA unit counts trees. 

     Many pieces of information about the site and sample trees are collected.  There are over 10,000 forested plots across the state and dozens of measured items.  Each year, a fifth of the plots are re-measured in the field and the rest are modeled.  Every five years, a report is issued that describes our forests. 

     It’s an expensive endeavor.  However, our forests are worth billions in monetary terms, alone.  Additionally, there are values for environmental services and sense of place that are difficult to assign a dollar value.  Nevertheless, we do, indeed, have a pretty good idea about the status of our forests.       

- 30 -

Bill Cook is an MSU Extension forester providing educational programming for the Upper Peninsula. His office is located at the MSU Forest Biomass Innovation Center near Escanaba. The Center is the headquarters for three MSU Forestry properties in the U.P., with a combined area of about 8,000 acres. He can be reached at cookwi@msu.edu or 906-786-1575.

Prepared by Bill Cook, Forester/Biologist, Michigan State University Extension, 6005 J Road, Escanaba, MI  49829
906-786-1575 (voice),  906-786-9370 (fax),  e-mail:  cookwi@msu.edu

Use / reprinting of these articles is encouraged. Please notify Bill Cook.
By-line should read "Bill Cook, MSU Extension" Please use the article trailer whenever possible.

Michigan State University is an affirmative action equal opportunity institution.  The U.S. Department of Agriculture prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital status or family status.   (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)

This website is maintained by Bill Cook, Michigan State University Extension Forest in the Upper Peninsula.  Comments, questions, and suggestions are gratefully accepted. 
Last update of this page was 5 November, 2018



This site is hosted by School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science at Michigan Technological University.

Michigan Tech