Where forest & forestry resources come together for all users!

Sponsored by the Michigan Forest Association and Michigan State University Extension


Forests & Carbon
Article #173, July 2011
By Bill Cook

     Forests, trees, carbon, and climate change are linked by a large and growing body of science.  Forests and trees both consume and emit carbon.  Human activities affect forest carbon.  The balance is sometimes called a net carbon balance and these values change with a wide range of conditions. 

     Human activity, also, both consumes and emits carbon.  Forest industry, forest products, and our uses of wood are three sets of important variables, among others, in the net carbon equation.  A large quantity of carbon is stored in wood buildings, landfills, and other pools. 

     A “life cycle analysis” (LCA) is an equation or model that incorporates as many variables as possible to determine the net effect of a particular activity on carbon, energy, or some other resource of interest.  LCAs vary in their focus and purpose. 

     For example, what effect does using wood for energy production have on atmospheric carbon? 

     Burning wood produces more carbon than burning coal.   So, does that make coal the more environmentally conscious choice?  Probably not.  Consider the carbon cycle. 

     The source of carbon must be considered.  Coal, petroleum, and natural gas are fossil fuels that contain carbon which has not been in living systems for millions of years.  Wood contains carbon from within living systems and the carbon cycle.  Trees obtain it from the atmosphere.   Burning trees returns it to the atmosphere, to be re-absorbed by trees and other plants. 

     So, does that make wood energy carbon neutral?  Not necessarily.

     Forests and trees have different LCA outputs based on factors such as forest type, soils, age, stand density, and others.   Trees and older forests tend to have net carbon balances closer to zero, or sometimes even negative.  A negative carbon balance would mean a forest would emit more carbon than it absorbs. 

     So, when older, more mature forests are replaced by regenerating, younger forests, the net carbon balance is likely to be more positive, all other factors equal, which is usually not the case.  A graph line showing net carbon balances typically rises and then flattens with forest age. 

     Carbon pools in the soil, trees, and other organisms change with forest conditions.  Older forests tend to accumulate increasingly large stocks of carbon.  Following a harvest, depending upon the kind of harvest, quantities of carbon are released to the atmosphere, where much of it temporarily resides until it’s re-absorbed by vegetation.  Other quantities are converted to wood, paper, and energy products.  Forest products have variable carbon storage times.

     So, a vibrant wood-using industrial sector and research-based forest management will promote more vigorous forests that absorb more carbon, as well as creating semi-permanent pools of carbon in buildings and other end uses.  The net effect will likely be a positive carbon balance, which would work against climate change. 

     Other “net” effects typically include more robust local economies, more diverse habitat, healthier forests, and enhanced ecological services. 

     However, forest systems and human wood use are complex, involving many variables of unequal importance.  Building an LCA model to more precisely describe flows and balances is difficult.  Some LCAs quantify only a portion of the entire cradle to grave system.  Researchers continually work on improving our understanding of how forests and other ecological systems operate, especially with respect to addressing critical questions about serious issues. 

     There is no doubt that forests are essential to our survival and that we need them on a daily basis to supply products and services.  How we choose to treat valuable natural resources remains a choice. 

- 30 -

Bill Cook is an MSU Extension forester providing educational programming for the Upper Peninsula. His office is located at the MSU Forest Biomass Innovation Center near Escanaba. The Center is the headquarters for three MSU Forestry properties in the U.P., with a combined area of about 8,000 acres. He can be reached at cookwi@msu.edu or 906-786-1575.

Prepared by Bill Cook, Forester/Biologist, Michigan State University Extension, 6005 J Road, Escanaba, MI  49829
906-786-1575 (voice),  906-786-9370 (fax),  e-mail:  cookwi@msu.edu

Use / reprinting of these articles is encouraged. Please notify Bill Cook.
By-line should read "Bill Cook, MSU Extension" Please use the article trailer whenever possible.

Michigan State University is an affirmative action equal opportunity institution.  The U.S. Department of Agriculture prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital status or family status.   (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)

This website is maintained by Bill Cook, Michigan State University Extension Forest in the Upper Peninsula.  Comments, questions, and suggestions are gratefully accepted. 
Last update of this page was 5 November, 2018



This site is hosted by School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science at Michigan Technological University.

Michigan Tech